Validity of applying the principle of self-determination of peoples by separatist entities in Ukraine

The process of modern social development is determined by two dialectically opposite tendencies: centripetal, expressed in worldwide integration and globalization, centrifugal, manifested regional localization, one the forms which phenomenon separatism – desire regions within states to separate, acquire greater political independence, sovereignty up territorial separation or joining another state. purpose this paper was analyse theoretical issues national self-determination principle equality peoples its relationship with separatism. study used a set methods techniques scientific cognition. principal ones included dialectical method, comparative legal formal method logical analysis. analyses possibility reference separatist entities Ukraine as justification for their activities. minimum necessary criteria grounds are considered, including presence an effective connection subject certain territory; itself, i.e., people (ethnos), claims self-determination; recognition international community such potential bearer right self-determination. As territory, doctrine law practice recognizes cultural territory any ethnic group. This limited common interests entire state, lies unconditional preservation inviolability integrity territory. recognize historical that has developed stable features language, culture, mentality, well awareness unity difference from others through conscious self-name. At same time, diasporas migrants must obey laws country residence on citizenship permanent residence. community, they those who under colonial rule, occupation foreign policy racism. Consequently, does not protect movements whose goal secession if do meet these criteria. means entitled secession, activity terrorist organizations. practical value materials conclusions presented further use developments aimed at analysis separatism, law-making sphere, sphere enforcement related ensuring rights freedoms citizens.